By Michael A. Rinella
Pharmakon: Plato, Drug tradition, and identification in old Athens examines the rising challenge for controlling states of mental ecstasy within the heritage of western suggestion, targeting historical Greece (c. 750 - 146 BCE), really the Classical interval (c. 500 - 336 BCE) and particularly the dialogues of the Athenian thinker Plato (427 - 347 BCE).Employing a various array of fabrics starting from literature, philosophy, drugs, botany, pharmacology, faith, magic, and legislations, Pharmakon essentially reframes the conceptual context of the way we learn and interpret Plato's dialogues. Michael A. Rinella demonstrates how the ability and fact claims of philosophy, time and again likened to a pharmakon, opposes itself to the cultural authority of a bunch of alternative occupations in old Greek society who derived their powers from, or likened their authority to, a few pharmakon. those incorporated Dionysian and Eleusinian faith, physicians and different healers, magicians and different magic employees, poets, sophists, rhetoricians, in addition to others.Accessible to the final reader, but hard to the expert, Pharmakon is a entire exam of where of substances in historical notion that would compel the reader to appreciate Plato in a brand new approach.
Read or Download Pharmakon: Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity in Ancient Athens PDF
Similar social philosophy books
Social and political philosophy, not like different fields and disciplines, contains clash, war of words, deliberation, and motion. this article takes a brand new process and is familiar with philosophy no longer a lot as a narrative of serious thinkers or as a set of philosophical positions yet as a sequence of debates and disagreements during which scholars needs to take part.
During this very important and interesting quantity, overseas students current opposing viewpoints to discuss ten of crucial concerns in modern social philosophy. presents an unique research of a few of society’s so much urgent concerns Written through a superb forged of overseas students matters coated comprise the character of freedom, the bounds of spiritual tolerance, affirmative motion, parenting, the demise penalty, privateness, violence, global starvation, social variety, homosexuality, and abortion invitations the reader to take part within the alternate of arguments
Revised for the 1st time in over thirty years, this variation of Emile Durkheim’s masterful paintings at the nature and scope of sociology is up-to-date with a brand new creation and more desirable translation through prime pupil Steven Lukes that places Durkheim’s paintings into context for the twenty-first century reader.
- Willing Slaves Of Capital: Spinoza And Marx On Desire
- Melancholic Freedom: Agency and the Spirit of Politics
- Contributions to L'Année Sociologique
- Art + Quilt: Design Principles and Creativity Exercises
Extra info for Pharmakon: Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity in Ancient Athens
In some way others are to be judged inferior or in error in the heir’s reception of a legacy. The semantic field of relancer thus further clarifies what occurs in the action of inheritance. In his description of the reaffirmation of a legacy as “relaunching it otherwise,” Derrida presents the heir as one who plays an active role in receiving a legacy, which is to say in transforming it, while he at the same time acknowledges the irreducible dimension of alterity involved that is distributed across time.
There is thus a connection between the surenchère and Derrida’s call for more life, for greater openness and transformation. Beyond his engagement with Kant, I would contend that the surenchère is found in all of Derrida’s inheritances of others, even those who are closest to him. To take two prominent examples, when Derrida reads Heidegger, he always returns to the interplay between presence and absence in the latter’s work, and always seeks to push things one step further beyond a point where, in his view, Heidegger rests on a certain foundation of presence.
Beyond his engagement with Kant, I would contend that the surenchère is found in all of Derrida’s inheritances of others, even those who are closest to him. To take two prominent examples, when Derrida reads Heidegger, he always returns to the interplay between presence and absence in the latter’s work, and always seeks to push things one step further beyond a point where, in his view, Heidegger rests on a certain foundation of presence. With respect to Levinas, one of Derrida’s constant moves is to intensify the role and position of the third in the ethical relation, opening this relation up in a contradictory manner to the issues of justice and politics.