By János Kollár
This e-book offers a entire therapy of the singularities that seem within the minimum version software and within the moduli challenge for types. The research of those singularities and the advance of Mori's software were deeply intertwined. Early paintings on minimum versions depended on precise learn of terminal and canonical singularities yet many later effects on log terminal singularities have been acquired as outcomes of the minimum version application. fresh paintings at the abundance conjecture and on moduli of sorts of common variety depends on refined houses of log canonical singularities and conversely, the sharpest theorems approximately those singularities use newly built specified circumstances of the abundance challenge. This ebook untangles those interwoven threads, providing a self-contained and entire thought of those singularities, together with many formerly unpublished effects.
Read Online or Download Singularities of the Minimal Model Program PDF
Best algebraic geometry books
Very likely the main finished evaluation of special effects as noticeable within the context of geometric modelling, this quantity paintings covers implementation and idea in an intensive and systematic style. special effects and Geometric Modelling: arithmetic, includes the mathematical heritage wanted for the geometric modeling issues in special effects lined within the first quantity.
This publication constitutes the complaints of the 2000 Howard convention on "Infinite Dimensional Lie teams in Geometry and illustration Theory". It offers a few vital contemporary advancements during this sector. It opens with a topological characterization of standard teams, treats between different issues the integrability challenge of varied endless dimensional Lie algebras, offers gigantic contributions to special matters in glossy geometry, and concludes with attention-grabbing functions to illustration concept.
During this ebook the authors boost a conception of loose noncommutative services, in either algebraic and analytic settings. Such capabilities are outlined as mappings from sq. matrices of all sizes over a module (in specific, a vector area) to sq. matrices over one other module, which admire the dimensions, direct sums, and similarities of matrices.
- Exceptional Weierstrass Points and the Divisor on Moduli Space That They Define
- Geometry and Topology of Configuration Spaces
- Abelian varieties
- Equidistribution in Number Theory, An Introduction
Additional resources for Singularities of the Minimal Model Program
Then (X, ) has a dlt, Q-factorial, minimal model over S. Warning The proofs of the next two cases use some of the results that we develop in Chapters 4–5. Thus we will avoid using them until Chapter 7. 15) of (X, ) intersects f −1 (S 0 ) and (f −1 (S 0 ), |f −1 (S 0 ) ) → S 0 has a canonical model. Then (X, ) has a dlt, Q-factorial, minimal model over S and also a canonical model over S. 8 (n-folds) (Birkar, 2011; Hacon and Xu, 2011a) Assume that f : X → S such that (X, + ) is dlt is projective and there is an effective divisor and KX + + ∼Q,f 0.
Thus F is effective. Every exceptional divisor appears on some resolution, hence a(E, X) ≥ 0 for every divisor E. 2 Assume that KX is Q-Cartier. If a(E, X) > −1 for every exceptional divisor E then f∗ ωY = ωX . The converse usually does not hold. Proof If mKX is Cartier, we have an equality OY (mKY ) = f ∗ OX (mKX )(mF ) where F = i a(Ei , X)Ei . Set G := i Ei . Since ma(Ei , X) > −m is an integer, we know that (m − 1)G + mF is effective. Thus the previous argument yields that f∗ OY (mKY + mG)(−G) = OX (mKX ).
2) A canonical model of (X , ) is also a canonical model of (X, ). (3) If a(E, X , ) < a(E, X, ) for every π-exceptional divisor E then every weak canonical (resp. minimal) model of (X , ) is also a weak canonical (resp. minimal) model of (X, ). Proof Let (X w , w ) be a weak canonical model of (X, ). If E is any divisor on X , then a(E, X , ) ≤ a(E, X, ) (and equality holds if E is not πexceptional). 1), a(E, X , ) ≤ a(E, X, ) ≤ a(E, Xw , w ). 19) hold automatically, hence (X w , w ) is also a weak canonical model of (X , ).